Cases 1 - 10 of 53
LIZARAGA GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26078
Plaintiff:
RAMON LIZARAGA GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SALINAS-GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24009
Plaintiff:
RAMON SALINAS-GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia et al v. TNL Express SA de CV et al
as 5:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ramon Sebastian Garcia and Raul Angel Flores
Defendant:
TNL Express SA de CV and Jose Luis Buentello Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Holley et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01838
Plaintiff:
Holley Tony, Anthony Holley and Tony Holley
Defendant:
The City of New York, Detective Ramon J. Garcia, Police Officer Thomas Accomando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvardo Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Townsend, Lieutenant Foust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Ramon Lopez-Garcia
as 22-50120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAMON LOPEZ-GARCIA, AKA Ramon Garcia Lopez
Garcia v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2022cv02599
Plaintiff:
Algiers Ramon Sanders Garcia
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John J. Kerwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brahms-Garcia v. Garland
as 21-1238
Petitioner:
JOSE RAMON BRAHMS-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramon Garcia v. William Hutchings, et al
as 21-16263
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAMON JACOBO GARCIA
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
