Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cannon v. Doskey et al
as 5:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Grover Cannon and Grover De
Defendant:
Dwight Doskey, Ramona Emanuel, Edwin Blewer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Doskey et al
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Grover Cannon
Defendant:
Dwight Doskey, Ramona Emanuel, Edwin Blewer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Police Dept Shreveport
as 21-30172
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, State of Louisiana, Cherly Stills and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dennis Ray Davis, Jr.
Davis v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2017cv00531
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Police Dept of Shreveport, District Attorneys Office Caddo Parish, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Emanuel
as 5:2015cv02650
Plaintiff:
Akeem Brilaunte Reed
Defendant:
Ramona Emanuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2014cv02313
Plaintiff:
Laravious Jackson
Defendant:
Ramona Emanuel, Kevin Berg, John A Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuels v. Brown et al
as 5:2014cv01813
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Roy Brown, Ramona Emanuel, Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mickey Cade v. Charles Scott, et al
as 13-31107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICKEY CADE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES REX SCOTT, UNKNOWN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, RAMONA EMANUEL and others
Samuels v. Emanuel et al
as 5:2013cv02775
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Ramona Emanuel, Charles Rex Scott, Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. Pierce et al
as 5:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Leonard Pierce, William Tuggle, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
