Cases 1 - 10 of 96
D.W. v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and Susan Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brazier v. East Saint Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03894
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Brazier
Defendant:
East Saint Louis Police Department, K. Randolph, J. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meeks v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Meeks
Defendant:
Jarrod Peters, Randolph County Sheriff's Office, Chris Guisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Randolph County Jail
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. TERRY
Defendant:
Randolph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv04654
Plaintiff:
Willie Randolph
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Dir. Harris, Supt. Lintron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50158
Respondent:
Mr. Ciolli and Andrew Ciolli
Petitioner:
Albert J. Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ruiz v. Strow et al
as 4:2020cv04267
Defendant:
Adkison Hilgendorf, Jane/Jon Doe, Shellie A and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wolff et al
as 3:2020cv01337
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Jarrod Peters, Deputy Sheriff Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Randolph County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv01280
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Jarrod Peters, Austin Peck and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Francis, Jr. et al
as 3:2020cv50429
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Adkison Hilgendorf, Shellie A. and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
