Cases
Randolph Barksdale v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 15-1659
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDOLPH BARKSDALE
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
BARKSDALE v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2015cv00489
Petitioner: RANDOLPH BARKSDALE
Respondent: LAWRENCE P MAHALLY, KATHLEEN KANE and R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barksdale v. Mahally et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00173
Petitioner: Randolph Barksdale
Respondent: Lawrence P Mahally, Kathleen Kane and R. Seth Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph Barksdale v. Michael Klopotoski, et al
as 09-4605
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDOLPH BARKSDALE
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI and ATTY GEN PA
Defendant - Non-Participating: DA PHILADELPHIA
Randolph Barksdale v. David Larkins, et al
as 09-4604
Plaintiff - Appellant: RANDOLPH BARKSDALE
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID LARKINS, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
BARKSDALE v. KLOPOTOSKI et al
as 2:2009cv02658
Petitioner: RANDOLPH BARKSDALE
Respondent: MICHAEL D. KLOPOTOSKI, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?