Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Patrick White, I v. Random House, Inc., et al
as 13-56175
Plaintiff - Appellant: PATRICK WHITE, I
Defendant - Appellee: RANDOM HOUSE, INC., SHAWN COREY CARTER and DREAM HAMPTON
Stutzman et al. v. Armstrong, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00116
Plaintiff: Rob Stutzman and Jonathan Wheeler
Defendant: Lance Armstrong, Penguin Group (USA), Inc., G.P. Putnam's Sons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patrick White v. Random House Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05150
Defendant: Dream Hampton, Jay-Z and Random House Inc
Plaintiff: Patrick White
Joseph OBrien v. Random House Inc
as 2:2011cv05108
Plaintiff: Joseph OBrien
Defendant: Random House Inc
The Ray Charles Foundation v. Ray Charles Robinson Jr. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv08799
Defendant: DOES, Random House, Inc.,, Ray Charles Robinson, Jr and others
Plaintiff: The Ray Charles Foundation
Donald M. Dible v. Random House, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv03800
Plaintiff: Donald M. Dible
Defendant: Random House, Inc., and Dr. Nick Trout
Donald J. Dible v. Random House, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv02149
Defendant: Jana Christy, Julie Aigner Clark, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Donald J. Dible
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ball & Chain LLC v. Random House Inc.
as 2:2010cv00235
Plaintiff: Ball & Chain LLC
Defendant: Random House Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Herbert Cohen v. Barney Hoskyns, et al
as 09-56719
Plaintiff - Appellant: HERBERT COHEN
Defendant - Appellee: BARNEY HOSKYNS, an individual and RANDOM HOUSE, INC., a New York corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?