Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Lisa Nance and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koehn v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Zachary Koehn
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Brad Hoenig and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krier v. Gosnell et al
as 4:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Sean Krier
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Defendant:
Iowa State Penitentiary, Rebecca Bowker, Gosnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Holmes v. Randy Gibbs
as 21-1345
Petitioner / Appellant:
Thomas D. Holmes
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Gibbs, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary
Gipson v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
John Oliver Gipson
Defendant:
Randy Gibbs and Phillip Eaves
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Cook, Jr. v. Randy Gibbs
as 21-1059
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gene D. Cook, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Randy Gibbs, Warden/Iowa State Penitentiary
Stone v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Linda Koechle, Beth Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Dewann Marquise Stone
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Linda Koechle, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Jason Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Beth Skinner, Randy Gibbs and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Joshua McCoy and Joshua Frank McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2020cv00413
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Linda Koechle, Beth Skinner and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Imere Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
