Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Davis v. Workman, et al
as 12-7043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN N. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden, ART LIGHTEL, Deputy Warden and DEBBIE ALDRIDGE, Unit Manager
Davis v. Workman et al
as 6:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Stephen N. Davis
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Art Lightel and Debbie Aldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Workman et al
as 6:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Centerdor Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Randy Workman and Michael K Addison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Workman, et al
as 12-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB BARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, DEBBIE MORTON, Deputy Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, CHAD BROWN, Case Worker, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and others
Barrett v. Workman et al
as 6:2011cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barrett
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Debbie Morton, Chad Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Workman et al
as 4:2011cv00426
Petitioner:
Christopher M Vickers
Respondent:
Randy Workman and Chester Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00119
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Vickers
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones, Randy Workman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers vs Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Vickers
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones and Randy Workman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jones, et al
as 10-7029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, RANDY WORKMAN, CHIEF MEDICAL DIRECTOR, CHO, D.O.C. and others
Fulsom v. Workman et al
as 6:2010cv00129
Plaintiff:
Najee M. Fulsom
Defendant:
Randy Workman, L. Wilson, Hawk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
