Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Love v. Jacobson, et. al.
as 5:2019cv00259
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Interested Party:
United States of America
Huddleston v. John Christner Trucking, LLC
as 4:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huddleston, Ryan Cooper, James Murphy and others
Defendant:
John Christner Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ransom v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Junior Dewayne Ransom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sanchez v. Mina et al
as 4:2015cv00719
Plaintiff:
Latisha Sanchez and April Mina
Defendant:
Total Assessment Solutions Corporation, White County Medical Center and CE Ransom, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ransom v. Garfield County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2015cv00828
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Allen Ransom
Defendant:
Tim Doyle, James Priest, Fitzwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Corley et al
as 5:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Eugene E Ransom
Defendant:
Phillip Corley, Regeonia Zmek, Leslie Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Junior Dewayne Ransom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kranz v. Ransom
as 5:2009cv01039
Plaintiff:
Leo Douglas Kranz
Defendant:
Donald Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Beneficial Investment v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Beneficial Investment, Michael Blair, Denise Blair and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Russell v. Alorica, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lateisha Taylor, Melissa Castro, Cindy Miller and others
Defendant:
Alorica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
