Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Arellano v. Jones, et al.
as 23-3475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
JONES, (LVN) Nurse, SIHOTANG, (LVN) Nurse, MARTIN, Doctor and others
Raul Arellano v. Michael Santos, et al
as 21-56348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR MICHAEL BALBIN SANTOS, Primary Care Provider, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and others
Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
as 21-56249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK
Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
as 21-56214
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Raul Arellano v. Guldseth, et al
as 21-55273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
S. ROBERTS, Chief Medical Executive, GULDSETH, Doctor, CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE, Health Care Provider to C.D.C.R. and others
Raul Arellano v. Doe
as 21-55148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
DOE, #1, Officer
Raul Arellano v. Michael Santos, et al
as 20-56305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BALBIN SANTOS, Primary Care Provider (Doctor)
Defendant:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-55895
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-55641
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Raul Arellano v. K. Dean, et al
as 20-55505
Defendant / Appellee:
K. DEAN, Dr., M. GLYNN, Deputy Director at California Correctional Health Care Services, S. ROBERTS, M.D., Chief Medical Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
