Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Arellano v. Olson
as 3:2021cv01685
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano
Defendant:
R. Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Raul Arellano v. Guldseth, et al
as 21-55273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
S. ROBERTS, Chief Medical Executive, GULDSETH, Doctor, CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE, Health Care Provider to C.D.C.R. and others
Raul Arellano v. Doe
as 21-55148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
DOE, #1, Officer
Raul Arellano v. Michael Santos, et al
as 20-56305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BALBIN SANTOS, Primary Care Provider (Doctor)
Defendant:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-55895
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Arellano v. Guldseth et al
as 3:2020cv01633
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano
Defendant:
Dr. Guldseth, C.D.C.R., California Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Arellano v. Doe #1
as 3:2020cv01564
Plaintiff:
Raul Arellano
Defendant:
Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Raul Arellano v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-55641
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Raul Arellano v. K. Dean, et al
as 20-55505
Defendant / Appellee:
K. DEAN, Dr., M. GLYNN, Deputy Director at California Correctional Health Care Services, S. ROBERTS, M.D., Chief Medical Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden
Raul Arellano v. L. Helmick, et al
as 20-55494
Defendant / Appellee:
L. HELMICK, Correctional Officer, UNKNOWN OFFICER #1, MACK O. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant:
E. OJEDA, Correctional Sergeant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
