Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lopez-Galeaz v. Garland
as 23-60057
Petitioner:
Jose Raul Lopez-Galeaz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Lopez-Mendoza
as 21-51115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Lopez-Mendoza
USA v. Lopez-Mendoza
as 21-51094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Lopez-Mendoza
USA v. Raul Lopez-Cortez
as 18-50595
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
USA v. Raul Lopez-Cortez
as 17-50723
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL LOPEZ-CORTEZ
Garza Rodriguez et al v. Escamilla Lara et al
as 2:2013cv00077
Respondent:
Maria Isabel Escamilla Lara, Jose Raul Lopez and Marivel Lopez
Petitioner:
Genero Garza Garcia and Maria Lucila Garza Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 (b) Appl. for Return of Child Pursuant to Hague Convention
Gale et al v. Proskauer Rose LLP et al
as 3:2012cv01803
Plaintiff:
Michael Gale , Andres Banuelos , Felipe Benavides and others
Defendant:
Proskauer Rose LLP , THOMAS V. SJOBLOM , Chadbourne & Parke LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Gale et al v. Proskauer Rose LLP et al
as 5:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Acosta, Alfredo Ruiz Trust, Asociacion Latino Americana de Supermercados, A.C. and others
Defendant:
Spencer C. Barasch, CAS & Co Limited, Chadbourne & Parke LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Raul Elizondo-Lopez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60018
Petitioner:
RAUL ELIZONDO-LOPEZ, also known as Raul Lopez Elizondo
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv00292
Plaintiff:
Raul Lopez and Diana Lopez
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Christopher Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
