Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Vaughan v. Jonathan Grate, et al
as 21-5387
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA BARKER, RCC Unit 3 Administrator, Law Library Manager, in her individual & official capacities, ASHLEY SHORT, in her individual & official capacities, AMY ROBEY, RCC Deputy Warden for Operations, in her individual & official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Michael Vaughan v. James Erwin, et al
as 21-5361
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA FRENCH, in her individual capacity, COMMISSIONER JAMES ERWIN, in his individual and official capacities, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & WARDEN RAVONNE SIMS, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Vaughan v. Grate et al
as 3:2019cv00177
Defendant:
Jonathon Grate, Ashley Short, Chris Kleymeyer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Sims
as 5:2018cv00424
Respondent:
Warden Ravonne Sims
Petitioner:
John David Cherry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughan v. Erwin et al
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Michael Vaughan
Defendant:
James Erwin, Rodney Ballard, Kimberly Potter-Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dishman et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 0:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dishman and A. D.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Sims
as 1:2017cv00111
Petitioner:
Lonnie Harris
Respondent:
Ravonne Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stoess v. Sims
as 3:2017cv00210
Petitioner:
Edward Ritchie Stoess
Respondent:
Ravonne Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tevis v. Sims
as 5:2017cv00118
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Tevis
Respondent:
Ravonne Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonds v. Rowlette et al
as 5:2016cv00124
Petitioner:
Todd Bonds
Respondent:
R.W. (Rick) Rowlette, Blackburn Correctional Complex, Ms. McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
