Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. RAWLE et al
as 1:2022cv01620
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BOWMAN
Defendant:
MARY RAWLE, THE CENTER FOR GESTALT DEVELOPMENT, INC., JOHN J. POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rhodes et al v. Westville Correctional Facility
as 3:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Vincent W Boyd, Brandon Rhodes, Vincent Boyd and others
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. LaPorte County Sheriffs Department et al
as 4:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Advance Correctional Healthcare, LaPort County Jail Medical Staff and LaPorte County Sheriffs Department
Plaintiff:
Ian L Rawls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker-Rawls v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2018cv00445
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Tucker-Rawls
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
RAWLS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04098
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
SHARON RAWLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goings v. Potter et al
as 3:2017cv00717
Plaintiff:
David Goings, III
Defendant:
Gloria Potter , Andrew Liaw , Corizon Health Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAWLINGS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00975
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LINDA K. RAWLINGS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rawls v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2014cv01794
Plaintiff:
Ian L Rawls
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, Sandy Harris and Dr Walden Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. Superintendent
as 3:2014cv01795
Petitioner:
Ian L Rawls
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
