Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Webb v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
as 1:2019cv00039
Respondent:
Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Michael Pacheco and Wyoming Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clint Raymond Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 1:2018cv00018
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Christensen
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Defendant:
Natrona County Circuit Court Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. Edward D Jones & Company LP
as 2:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Mark E Raymond
Defendant:
Edward D Jones & Company LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Raymond Flores
Defendant:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00136
Petitioner:
Raymond Duane Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sullivan v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 2:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Monty D Sullivan
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert Lampert, State of Wyoming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis vs. Clark
as 2:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anthony Lewis
Defendant:
Jerry Clark and Natrona County Sheriff's Department Deputy Lieutenant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Riverton WY et al
as 2:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Wanda Harris and Raymond Harris
Defendant:
Riverton WY , Gary Cruce , Riverton Police Department Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
