Cases 1 - 10 of 10
M.G., et al v. Young, et al
as 15-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.G., L.J., F.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID C. YOUNG, ROBERT T. SMITH, JOSEPH R. HUDSON and others
Tenorio v. Pitzer, et al
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUSSELL TENORIO
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN PITZER
Defendant:
RAYMOND D. SCHULTZ, THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, ROBERT LICCIONE and others
Tenorio v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2013cv00574
Plaintiff:
Russell Tenorio
Defendant:
Andrea Ortiz , Raymond D. Schultz , Robert Liccione and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
M.G. et al v. Young et al
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
M.G. , L.J. and F.C.
Defendant:
David C Young, Robert T Smith, Joseph R Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tenorio v. Pitzer, et al
as 1:2012cv01295
Plaintiff:
Russell Tenorio
Defendant:
Brian Pitzer , Raymond D. Schultz and City of Albuquerque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2011cv01012
Plaintiff:
Robert Torres
Defendant:
Francisco Hernandez , Timothy McCarson , Jennifer Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2011cv01014
Plaintiff:
Hilda Valdez
Defendant:
Luis Hernandez , Jennifer Garcia , Patrick Apodaca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tenorio v. Taylor et al
as 1:2011cv01013
Plaintiff:
Michaele Tenorio
Defendant:
Edouard Taylor , Jennifer Garcia , Patrick Apodaca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Drutok et al
as 1:2010cv00893
Plaintiff:
Paul Randolph
Defendant:
Walter Drutok, Raymond D. Schultz and City of Albuquerque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P.M. et al v. Young et al
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
P.M., P.M., P.M. and others
Defendant:
David C. Young, Robert T. Smith, Joseph R. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
