Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fallica v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Fallica
Defendant:
Bank of America, Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Monica Tarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
In Re: Cheryl A. Wolf and Raym
as 21-2929
Petitioner:
Cheryl A. Wolf, United States, Ex Rel and Raymond J. Fallica, United States, Ex Rel
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cheryl Wolf, et alIn re: Cheryl Wolf, et al
as 19-5291
Not Yet Classified:
In re: Cheryl A. Wolf, Raymond J. Fallica and Mary Piscitello
Wolf et al. v. United States
as 2:2019cv02100
Petitioner:
Mary Piscitello, Raymond J. Fallica and Cheryl A. Wolf
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wolf et al. v. United States
as 1:2019cv00696
Petitioner:
Mary Piscitello, Raymond J. Fallica and Cheryl A. Wolf
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Wolf v. Federal Bureau of Investigatio
as 18-796
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cheryl A. Wolf, Raymond J. Fallica and Mary Piscitello
Respondent - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Wolf et al v. US Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2016cv09436
Petitioner:
Cheryl A. Wolf, Raymond J. Fallica and Mary Piscitello
Respondent:
US Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
In re: Raymond Fallica
as 13-4389
Petitioner:
Raymond J. Fallica
Respondent:
North Shore University Hospital, State of New York and Smith Carroad, Levy & Wan
Wolf v. D.O.J. Office Professional Re
as 13-750
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cheryl A. Wolf and Raymond J. Fallica
Respondent - Appellee:
D.O.J. Office Professional Responsibility and U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee
Fallica v. North Shore University Hospital et al
as 2:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Fallica
Defendant:
North Shore University Hospital, Smith Carroad, Levy & Wan and State Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
