Cases 1 - 8 of 8
RUSSO et al v. AEROJET ROCKETDYNE, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03024
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC., GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK C. RUSSO and HANNAH RUSSO
Counter Defendant:
DOW SILICONES CORPORATION and GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC.
Respondent:
ABB, INC.
Petitioner:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KELLY et al v. CBS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67269
Plaintiff:
BARRY KELLY and MOLLY KELLY
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'AMBROSIO et al v. HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION et al
as 5:2010cv04848
Plaintiff:
PETER D'AMBROSIO and MARCIA A. D'AMBROSIO
Defendant:
HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION , RAYTHEON COMPANY and BAE SYSTEMS, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRYANT et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv74747
Plaintiff:
VERNICE BRYANT, VERNICE BRYANT, VERNICE BRYANT and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, UNISYS CORPORATION and RAYTHEON COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SEITZ et al v. ADEL WIGGINS GROUP et al
as 2:2009cv60005
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SEITZ and MARY LOUISE SEITZ
Defendant:
ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AIR COOLED MOTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SEITZ et al v. ADEL WIGGINS GROUP et al
as 2:2009cv60004
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SEITZ and MARY LOUISE SEITZ
Defendant:
ADEL WIGGINS GROUP, AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AIR COOLED MOTORS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CARLISLE v. AVCO CORPORATION et al
as 5:2007cv73543
Plaintiff:
WANDA K. CARLISLE
Defendant:
AVCO CORPORATION, THE BOEING COMPANY, THE BOEING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Whipstock v. Raytheon Company
as 4:2007cv01497
Plaintiff:
Craig Whipstock
Defendant:
Raytheon Company and Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
