Cases 31 - 40 of 76
SANGREY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2016cv06370
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SANGREY and DOROTHY SANGREY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and READING ELEVATOR SERVICES, INC.
Consol_cross_claimant:
READING ELEVATOR SERVICES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Sangrey et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv02079
Plaintiff:
Richard Sangrey and Dorothy Sangrey
Defendant:
United States of America and Reading Elevator Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
DEARDEN et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEARDEN , VIRGINIAANNE ROSNER , DIEGO FRANK BURNS and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC , CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, NANETTE S. BRICKNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. DOE et al
as 5:2015cv05310
Plaintiff:
IVAN DAVIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and READING POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLLINGER v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM et al
as 5:2015cv05249
Plaintiff:
JAMES N. HOLLINGER
Defendant:
READING HEALTH SYSTEM, SACHIN L. SHRESTHA, ROBERT JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Thomas Ochs, et al v. Reading Hospital
as 15-2728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS OCHS and LAURA OCHS, H/W
Defendant - Appellee:
READING HOSPITAL
READ v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02586
Plaintiff:
MARY K. READ
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VELEZ v. READING HEALTH SYSTEM
as 5:2015cv01543
Plaintiff:
MARIA VELEZ
Defendant:
READING HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OCHS et al v. READING HOSPITAL
as 5:2014cv04017
Plaintiff:
THOMAS OCHS and LAURA OCHS
Defendant:
READING HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
