Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Ari Bailey, et al
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
Kim Millbrook v. USA, et al
as 17-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM LEE MILLBROOK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, LT. FOSROT, S.I.S. and others
Michael Rinaldi v. USA, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RINALDI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARRELL WATTS, Central Office, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE and others
Derrick Brown v. Scott Holtzapple, et al
as 15-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN SCOTT HOLTZAPPLE, ACTING WARDEN J. BUTLER, CAPTAIN B. TAGGERT and others
Brown v. Holtzapple et al
as 3:2015cv00711
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Scott Holtzapple, J. Butler, B. Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kim Millbrook v. USA, et al
as 13-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM MILLBROOK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN BLEDSOE, LT FOSROT, S.I.S. and others
Rinaldi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Michael Rinaldi
Defendant:
United States of America, Harrell Watts, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cardona v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jose Cristobal Cardona
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, D. Young, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
