Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Altemus v. Petty et al
as 1:2021cv01761
Plaintiff:
Attorney Timothy Altemus
Defendant:
Attorney Elliott D. Petty, Attorney Catherine W. Steiner, Shawn Parcells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Thomas v. National Autopsy and Tissue Recovery Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01761
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Thomas
Defendant:
Shawn Parcells and National Autopsy and Tissue Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Estate of John J. Gough et al v. Parcells et al
as 8:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Estate of John J. Gough, Ann Gough and Kathleen Gough
Defendant:
National Authopsy and Tissue Recovery Services, Inc. and Shawn Parcells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Law Offices of Mark J. Muffoletto, LLC v. American Recovery Service Incorporated
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
American Recovery Service Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Law Offices of Mark J. Muffoletto, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02751
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
