Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
BALCERAK v. AMERICAN RED CROSS BLOOD SERVICE RIVER VALLEY REGION
as 1:2013cv00214
Defendant:
AMERICAN RED CROSS BLOOD SERVICE RIVER VALLEY REGION
Plaintiff:
STANLEY W. BALCERAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
CAGE v. AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS
as 1:2011cv01335
Defendant:
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Tucker v. American Red Cross et al
as 3:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Cassie Tucker
Defendant:
American Red Cross and Wa-Nee Community Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jeffers et al v. American Red Cross et al
as 3:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Janice Jeffers, Janice Jeffers, Kelly Jeffers and others
Petitioner:
Kristen Jeffers and Kristen Jeffers
Defendant:
American Red Cross and Fidelity Brokerage Services LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hawkins et al v. Hidalgo et al
as 2:2008cv00323
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Hawkins and Lori Collins
Defendant:
Mark Hidalgo, Renee Pluchinsky, East Chicago Indiana School City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EATON et al v. BOXELL et al
as 1:2007cv00491
Plaintiff:
DONNA EATON and RICHARD EATON
Defendant:
MAX BOXELL and AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DISHMAN v. MUNCIE FAMILY YMCA et al
as 1:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
MILDRED DISHMAN
Defendant:
MUNCIE FAMILY YMCA, MUNCIE FAMILY YMCA, AMERICAN RED CROSS HOOSIER HEARTLAND CHAPTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
