Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Lewis v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Reese Lane and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Sammy Clark
Defendant:
Reese Lane, Oklahoma State of and Tony Osbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Lane et al
as 5:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Micheal Watkins
Defendant:
Reese Lane and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cherokee Nation et al
as 4:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Smith
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation, Cherokee Nation Entertainment, LLC, Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00145
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maxwell v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Carlos Terrill Maxwell
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowboys for Life et al v. Sampson et al
as 5:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cowboys for Life , Jennifer M Ortman and Joshua R Bowman
Defendant:
Brian K Sampson, Lee Bird, Burns Hargis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prather v. Payne County Correctional Center et al
as 5:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Payne County Correctional Center and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Payne County Correctional Officers et al
as 5:2012cv01225
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Payne County Correctional Officers and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
