Labor Cases
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05763
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Savings Fund and others
Defendant: Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. and Joseph Campisi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv02687
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Savings Fund and others
Defendant: Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. and Joseph Campisi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund, et al, v. Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02874
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Savings Fund and others
Defendant: Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. and Joseph Campisi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al, v. Regency Group of Illinois, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07533
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund
Defendant: Regency Group of Illinois, Inc., Joseph Campisi, Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. Regency Decorating, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02893
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Savings Fund and others
Defendant: Regency Decorating, Inc., John Campisi and Regency Group of Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
K. M., et al v. Regence Blueshield, et al
as 14-35108
Plaintiff - Appellee: K. M., by and through his parents and guardians, L.M. and E.M., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, B. S., by and through his parents and guardians, E.S. and R.S., individually on behalf of Garrigan Lyman Group Health Benefit Plan, GARRIGAN LYMAN GROUP HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellant: REGENCE BLUESHIELD and CAMBIA HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., FKA The Regence Group
Rowell v. GM Nameplate, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00535
Plaintiff: Brenda Rowell
Defendant: GM Nameplate, Inc. , Carol Biggerstaff and The Regence Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association et al. vs. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv05619
Plaintiff: Michelle M Askar, D.C., Association of New Jersey Chiropractors, David R Barber, D.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Tri3 Enterprises LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff: The Regence Group
Defendant: Anthem Ohio, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Miggins & Miggins, Inc.
Petitioner: Jonathan M Cyrluk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bianchi v. Medical Service Bureau of Idaho Inc. Employees' Defined Benefit Plan and Trust et al
as 1:2008cv00267
Plaintiff: Jim Bianchi and Jim Bianchi
Defendant: Medical Service Bureau of Idaho Inc. Employees' Defined Benefit Plan and Trust, The Benchmark Group Retirement Plan, The Regence Group Retirement Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?