Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Working Washington v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
as 2:2012cv00566
Defendant: Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
Plaintiff: Working Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Central Puget Sound Regional T v. Level 3 Communications, LLC, et al
as 11-35480
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, also known as Sound Transit
Defendant - Appellee: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware corporation and MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES INC, a Delaware corporation, DBA Verizon Business Services
Chartis Specialty Insurance Company v. RCI/Herzog et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00437
Plaintiff: Chartis Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant: RCI/Herzog, Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Type: Contract Insurance
Central Puget Sound Regional T v. Level 3 Communications, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36061
Plaintiff - Appellee: CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, also known as Sound Transit
Defendant - Appellant: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware corporation
Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00749
Plaintiff: Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit)
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, LLC and MCI Communications Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pande Cameron and Company of S, et al v. Central Puget Sound Regional T, et al
as 09-35361
Plaintiff - Appellant: PANDE CAMERON AND COMPANY OF SEATTLE INC., a Washington corporation, PAUL M. ANDONIAN, GREGORY Y. ANDONIAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY, (Sound Transit) a Washington municipal corporation and CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington municipal corporation
Romine et al v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00081
Plaintiff: Learline Romine and Robert Buckley
Defendant: Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority and Leslie Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. American International Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2008cv01530
Plaintiff: Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority and Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
Defendant: American International Specialty Insurance Company, Marsh USA Inc and Marsh USA Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Pande Cameron and Company of Seattle Inc et al v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01312
Plaintiff: Pande Cameron and Company of Seattle Inc, Paul M Andonian, Paul M Andonian and others
Defendant: Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit), Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit), Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
AT&T Communications East Inc et al v. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
as 3:2007cv05186
Plaintiff: AT&T Communications East Inc, AT&T Communications East Inc, AT&T Communications East Inc and others
Defendant: Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority and Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Central Puget Sound Transit Authority
ThirdParty Defendant: Verizon Northwest, Inc., Level 3 Communications, LLC and Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., f/k/a MCI Communications, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Central Puget Sound Transit Authority
Counter Defendant: AT&T Communications East Inc, AT&T Communications East Inc, AT&T Communications East Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?