Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reiff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv06086
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Reiff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04431
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe 1-10 and Police Officer Christopher Reiff
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daly et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv03433
Plaintiff:
Preston Briggs, Andre Daly and Andre Jack
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, and Police Officer Christopher Reiff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03819
Plaintiff:
Arthur F. Anderson, Lorain A. Anderson, Newton L. Ball and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hailazopoulos v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06889
Plaintiff:
Eleni Hailazopoulos
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department/NYPD (Police Officer Alvarez), New York City Parks and Recreation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-RLM Kleiman v. O'Neill
as 1:2003cv03829
Plaintiff:
Diane Lori Kleiman
Defendant:
Paul H O'Neill
Mediator:
Devon Reiff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reiff v. Metz et al
as 1:2007cv06011
Plaintiff:
Roger Reiff
Defendant:
Frank A Metz, Jr, Sheila Feldman, Hellen L. Nelling and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Reiff v. Metz et al
as 7:2007cv06011
Plaintiff:
Roger Reiff
Defendant:
Frank A Metz, Jr, Sheila Feldman, Hellen L. Nelling and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
