Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00549
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and CF Dynamic Advances LLC
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Baykal
as 1:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Defendant:
Gokhan Baykal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01210
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Defendant:
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2013cv00633
Plaintiff:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Dynamic Advances, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Apple Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Dynamic Advances, LLC and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Helioptix LLC et al v. Enfocus Engineering Corp.
as 1:2011cv07246
Plaintiff:
Helioptix LLC and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Defendant:
Enfocus Engineering Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Flanigan v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Joseph Flanigan
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Bornt et al v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
as 1:2010cv00702
Plaintiff:
Candace A. Bornt , Michael Crandall , Kathleen Hans and others
Defendant:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
