Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Ackerman v. Maskoff et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Steffen Maskoff, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gustavo Hernandez v. Reubart
as 23-15388
Petitioner / Appellant:
GUSTAVO HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
REUBART
Ackerman v. Drummond et al
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
David Drummond, William Reubart, K. Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Steven Eric Gould
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Warden William Gittere and William Reubart
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 23-15280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, terminated per #9 FAC, ELY STATE PRISON, terminated per #9 FAC, EXUM, Dr. terminated per #9 FAC and others
Ackerman v. Lorenzo et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Lorenzo, Wilson Bernales, Melina Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Cooke
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Warden Tasheena Cooke, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasmine Sanchez v. Chet Rigney, et al
as 23-15168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CHET RIGNEY, CURTIS RIGNEY, WILLIAM REUBART and others
James McDaniel, Jr. v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. MCDANIEL, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, STATE OF NEVADA EX REL NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Rodriguez v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden William Reubart, Aaron D. Ford and Warden William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
