Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bhavsar et al v. Fulop et al
as 1:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Ric Fulop, James Haley, Ali El Siblani and others
Nominal Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc.
Zhou v. Desktop Metal, Inc., et al
as 23-1843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOPHIA ZHOU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS LUONGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AJMAIR HEER, YICHUN XIE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DESKTOP METAL, INC., RIC FULOP, JAMES HALEY and others
Interested Party:
CARL W. LENTZ, IV, ZEYU LIU, MATHEW MCINALLY and others
Wang v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08041
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
O'Dell v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07992
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Kent et al v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Coffman v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07900
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Lovoi v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06035
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lovoi
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Scott Dussault and others
Modar v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05465
Plaintiff:
El Mehdi Modar
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Scott Dussault and others
Cherry v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Michael Cherry
Defendant:
Ric Fulop, James Haley, Ali Elsiblani and others
Nominal Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc.
Keyser et al v. Fulop et al
as 1:2022cv11117
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Keyser and Reid Klootwyk
Defendant:
Ric Fulop, James Haley, Ali El-Siblani and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
