Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Meza v. Martinez
as 4:2014cv00044
Respondent:
Warden Ricardo Martinez
Petitioner:
Enrique Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Larius v. Martinez
as 4:2014cv00026
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Larius
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leon v. Martinez
as 4:2014cv00015
Petitioner:
Carlos Blanco Leon
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Martinez
as 4:2014cv00005
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Petitioner:
Santos Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez-Aguirre v. Martinez
as 4:2013cv00069
Petitioner:
Salvador Lopez-Aguirre
Respondent:
Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez-Sanchez v. Martinez
as 4:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cesar Lopez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden Ricardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meza v. USA
as 4:2013cv00388
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo Martinez Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Martinez et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 7:2012cv00305
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Martinez and Virginia Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Proskauer Rose LLP et al
as 3:2012cv01806
Plaintiff:
Pam Reed , Carrau Trust , David Galante and others
Defendant:
Proskauer Rose LLP , THOMAS V. SJOBLOM , Chadbourne & Parke LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Herrera-Ramirez et al v. Techcrete Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Castillo-Garcia, Carlos Herrera-Ramirez and Ricardo Martinez-Romero
Defendant:
Jeffrey Goss, Todd Niccum and Techcrete Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
