Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Morales v. Bena Rest. Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Balvinder Singh, Jaspal Singh, Bena Rest. Corp. doing business as Indian Taj and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv04001
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morales Santiago
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Acevedo et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11426
Plaintiff:
David Hutchinson, Jeffrey Bednar, Paul McCahey and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv01573
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morales
Defendant:
City Of New York , Bill De Blasio and Lisette Camilo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. NY F&B Services LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Morales
Defendant:
NY F&B Services LLC and Ertunc Gundogdu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luna et al v. Benny's Burritos, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06479
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Luna, Miguel Luis Yat Chic, Sinuhe Flores Munoz and others
Defendant:
Benny's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Benny's Burritos, Blockhead's Burritos, Inc. doing business as Blockheads, Egg White, Inc. doing business as Blockheads and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morales et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2010cv04311
Plaintiff:
Carmelina Morales and Ricardo Morales
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Morales et al
as 1:2008cv04807
Plaintiff:
Lisa Martin and Lisa Martin
Defendant:
Ricardo Morales, New York City Housing Authority and Yucol Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O' Neill v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2008cv01689
Plaintiff:
Gerard O' Neill
Defendant:
Tito Hernandez, Ricardo Morales and New York City Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
