Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Davis v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 6:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12706
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DAVID DAVIS and RICHARD DAVID DAVIS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08023
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85019
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD G. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02276
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41996
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis III v. United States of America
as 9:2019cv80118
Plaintiff:
Richard Odell Davis III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bell v. U.S. Bank National Assoc. et al
as 6:2018cv01826
Defendant:
Richard K. Davis, Andrew Cecere, Mark G. Runker and others
Plaintiff:
Renee D. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv24280
Plaintiff:
British D. Moss
Defendant:
Richard K. Davis, Andrew Cecere, Jennie P. Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
