Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2013cv00927
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00268
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00215
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 9:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Constitutional Question
as 6:2012cv00245
Defendant:
Constitutional Question
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Constitutional Question et al
as 1:2012cv00853
Defendant:
Constitutional Question, Mary Lou Robinson's General Order and PLRA's 3 Strike Provision
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. PLRA 3 Strike Provision
as 6:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
PLRA 3 Strike Provision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Roe et al
as 6:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Roe, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Goodwin et al
as 9:2012cv00059
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Gerald Goodwin, Paul White and Clyde Herrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
