Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Thomas Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 14-11174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS SAWYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, DAVID POTTER, Doctor Allred Unit, RICHARD E. WATHEN, Warden Allred Unit and others
Howard v. Eason et al
as 7:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Alex JaRaun Howard
Defendant:
Robert Eason, Michael Upshaw, Paul Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Wathen et al
as 7:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wayne Sullivan
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James Anders, Carla S Wadlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Wathen et al
as 7:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Lawton Frederick Tyson
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, Earnest R Cooke, Jonathen Eastep and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Cates et al
as 7:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Tommy C Cates, Richard E Wathen and David R Skelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renfro v. Zeisloft et al
as 7:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Renfro, Jr
Defendant:
Lawrence D Zeisloft and Richard E Wathen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nedro Parker, et al v. TDCJ, et al
as 14-10190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEDRO GWEN PARKER and FREDERICK DEONE GOODEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCIENCE CENTER/CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE CONTRACT (COMMITTEE), RICHARD E. WATHEN, In his official capacity and under color of office and others
Webster v. Wathen
as 3:2013cv03867
Petitioner:
Derrick Webster
Respondent:
Richard E Wathen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Sawyer v. David Potter, et al
as 13-10787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS C. SAWYER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID POTTER, RICHARD E WATHEN and TOMMY NORWOOD
Sawyer v. Director TDCJ-CID, et al
as 7:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID, David Potter, Richard E. Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
