Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Avenue Capital Management II,, et al v. Schaden, et al
as 15-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, AVENUE INTERNATIONAL MASTER, LP, a Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership, AVENUE INVESTMENTS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD F. SCHADEN, an individual., RICHARD E. SCHADEN, an individual, FREDERICK H. SCHADEN, an individual and others
Avenue Capital Management II, LP et al v. Schaden et al
as 1:2014cv02031
Plaintiff:
Avenue Capital Management II, LP , Avenue International Master, LP , Avenue Investments, LP and others
Defendant:
Richard F. Schaden, Richard E. Schaden, Frederick H. Schaden and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bonanno, et al v. The Quizno's Franchise Company, et al
as 09-500
Petitioner:
RAYMOND BONANNO, ANTHONY BONANNO, ROBERT PETER and others
Respondent:
THE QUIZNO'S FRANCHISE COMPANY, LLC, QUIZNO'S FRANCHISING, LLC, QUIZNO'S FRANCHISING II, LLC and others
Brunet et al v. Quizno's Franchise Company LLC et al
as 3:2008mc00008
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Brunet, Bonnie Brunet, Martin Rist and others
Defendant:
Quizno's Franchise Company LLC, Quizno's Franchising LLC, Quizno's Franchising II LLC and others
Movant:
Martin Agency, Inc. and Martin Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Brunet et al v. Quizno's Franchise Company LLC, The et al
as 1:2007cv01717
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Brunet, Martin Rist, Joseph Gibson and others
Defendant:
Quizno's Franchise Company LLC, The, Quizno's Franchising LLC, Quizno's Franchising II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Siemer et al v. The Quizno's Franchise Company LLC, et al
as 1:2007cv02170
Plaintiff:
Ilene Siemer, Ilene Siemer, Ilene Siemer and others
Defendant:
Quizno's Franchise Company LLC, The, Quizno's Franchising LLC, Quizno's Franchising II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
