Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Shmuel Erde v. Janet Jackson et al
as 2:2017cv04298
Defendant:
Doe Defendants, David Eisenberg, Richard Fresquez and others
Plaintiff:
Shmuel Erde
Louis Fresquez v. Moeroyk
as 12-15400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MOEROYK
Louis Fresquez v. USDC-CAFR
as 12-70632
:
In re: LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Petitioner:
LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
MERCY HOSPITAL BAKERSFIELD, CARDIONUCULAR LABORATORY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Harvey v. Fresquez
as 11-1331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher L. Harvey
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Fresquez, Fresquez Advisors LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Louis Fresquez v. Mercy Hospital Bakersfield, et al
as 10-17380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCY HOSPITAL BAKERSFIELD, CARDIONUCULAR LABORATORY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Harvey v. Fresquez et al
as 1:2010cv05291
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Harvey
Defendant:
Richard Fresquez , Fresquez Advisors LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Louis Fresquez v. J. Wofford, et al
as 10-16395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WOFFORD, B. RING, GARZE and others
Louis Fresquez v. Adams, et al
as 09-17271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, CARPENTER and DR WU
Louis Fresquez v. Mercy Hospital Bakersfield, et al
as 09-17230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS RICHARD FRESQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCY HOSPITAL BAKERSFIELD, CARDIONUCULAR LABORATORY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Fresquez v. People of State of California
as 5:2009cv00823
Petitioner:
Louis Richard Fresquez
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
