Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Franklin et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Eric Franklin, Kerry Emmerson, Katrina Garcia and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
(PC) Welk v. CA. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA. Dept. of Corrections, Robert Mayes, Mejorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Richard James Roberts et al
as 8:2021cv01615
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Richard James Roberts, TCFG Investment Advisors, LLC and TCFG Wealth Management, LLC
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01494
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. CA Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01799
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
CA Dept of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv01476
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Welk v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Richard James Welk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Rosemary Ndoh, D. Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard James Gabaldon v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard James Gabaldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
In the matter of Richard James Mendelsohn - SBN 57788
as 3:2020mc80036
Respondent:
Richard James Mendelsohn
(HC) (2255 - 2:05-cr-00368-JAM)) Pulley v. USA
as 2:2019cv00915
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard James Pulley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
