Cases 1 - 5 of 5
White Oak Realty, L.L.C., et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 17-30438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WHITE OAK REALTY, L.L.C. and CITRUS REALTY, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK, Lieutenant General, United States Army Chief of Engineers, in his official capacity, JOHN W. PEABODY, Major General, Commander, Mississippi Valley Division, United States Army Corps of Engineers, in his official capacity and others
Gulf Restoration Network et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2015cv06193
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P Bostick, Richard L Hansen and others
Plaintiff:
Gulf Restoration Network , Margie Vicknair-Pray and Pippin Frisbie-Calder
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Louisiana State v. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 15-30962
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board and the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, RICHARD L. HANSEN, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Commander for the New Orleans District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL C. WEHR, Major, in his official capacity as Commander for the Mississippi Valley Division of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Louisiana State v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2014cv02467
Plaintiff:
Louisiana State
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Richard L Hansen, Michael C Wehr and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
White Oak Realty, LLC et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2013cv04761
Plaintiff:
White Oak Realty, LLC and Citrus Realty, LLC
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P Bostick, John W Peabody and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
