Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lucas v. Eichas et al
as 6:2022cv06463
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lucas
Defendant:
Police Officer Shawn Eichas, Police Officer Eliud Rodriguez, "John Doe Police Officers 1-50" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gandolfo v. City of Medford and its Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01288
Defendant:
Officers John Doe and Richard Roe, Detective Patricia Sullivan, Lena Gasparro and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gandolfo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gullatt v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv05961
Plaintiff:
Chase Gullatt
Defendant:
City of New York, Warden John Duffy, Commissioner Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Del Pesce v. Ingraham et al
as 9:2016cv00818
Plaintiff:
Matthew Del Pesce
Defendant:
R. Ingraham, John Does 1-6 and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaylock v. Doe et al
as 2:2014cv05363
Defendant:
John 2:14cv5363 Doe, Richard Roe, Sheriff Michael Sposato and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Blaylock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conteh v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03646
Plaintiff:
Namala Conteh
Defendant:
The City of New York , The New York City Department of Corrections, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadian v. Digironamo et al
as 1:2014cv03441
Plaintiff:
Mayer Sadian
Defendant:
Digironamo, Timothy O'Brien, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruz v. John Does 1-6 et al
as 1:2012cv07570
Plaintiff:
Jorge Cruz
Defendant:
John Does 1-6, Jane Does 1-6, Richard Roe, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shabazz v. Howard et al
as 9:2012cv01372
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Defendant:
T. Howard, R. Rhondo, B. Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connally v. Doe et al
as 9:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jed Connally
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
