Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
SPRIGGS v. EASTERN STATES JOINT BOARD 322
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. SPRIGGS
Defendant:
EASTERN STATES JOINT BOARD 322
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
REED v. TISCHNER et al
as 1:2022cv00855
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
RICHARD S. TISCHNER and JENNIFER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WALLICK v. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE
as 1:2018cv01627
Defendant:
AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. WALLICK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CARTER et al v. URBAN SERVICE SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00643
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. CARTER and JONITA B. CARTER
Defendant:
URBAN SERVICE SYSTEMS CORPORATION and WILLIAM W. KEATING, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLICK v. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE
as 1:2016cv02063
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S. WALLICK
Defendant:
AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
