Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Goodridge v. Hickman et al
as 2:2007cv02650
Petitioner:
Peter Goodridge
Respondent:
Rod Hickman, Jean Woodford, Carol Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Subia et al
as 3:2007cv05650
Petitioner:
Harry L. Eldridge
Respondent:
Richard Subia and Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Subia
as 3:2007cv05620
Petitioner:
Andrew S. Austin
Respondent:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chris Tingirides v. Richard Subia
as 5:2007cv01323
Petitioner:
Chris Tingirides
Respondent:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pham v. Subia
as 3:2007cv01736
Petitioner:
Ving Quang Pham
Respondent:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lavell D Hardy v. Richard Subia, Warden
as 2:2007cv04468
Petitioner:
Lavell D Hardy
Respondent:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouser v. Rutherford et al
as 2:2007cv01107
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
Defendant:
K Rutherford, L.T. Hillard, E Sauceda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strack v. Subia et al
as 2:2007cv01021
Petitioner:
Kevin T. Strack
Respondent:
Richard Subia and Attorney General CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrence Edwin Prince v. Richard Subia
as 2:2007cv02757
Petitioner:
Terrence Edwin Prince, Terrence Edwin Prince and Terrence Edwin Prince
Respondent:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wesley Loren Mitchell Jr v. Richard Subia
as 5:2007cv00448
Petitioner:
Wesley Loren Mitchell, Jr
Respondent:
Richard Subia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
