Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Chukwuma Azubuko v. Richard Story, et al
as 20-5279
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis Saylor, IV, In Individual and Official Capacities and Richard W. Story, In Individual and Official Capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
AZUBUKO v. STORY et al
as 1:2019cv03855
Defendant:
DENIS SAYLOR, IV and RICHARD W. STORY
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cuyler v. Story et al
as 1:2019mi00073
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., Richard W. Story, John Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Cuyler
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Cuyler v. Story et al
as 1:2018mi00108
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., Richard W. Story, John Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Cuyler
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Cuyler v. Story et al
as 1:2018mi00079
Defendant:
Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., Richard W. Story, John Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Cuyler
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Cuyler v. Story et al
as 1:2018mi00057
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Cuyler
Defendant:
Richard W. Story, John Horn, Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Heard v. Ross et al
as 1:2018mi00029
Plaintiff:
Robert Soldier Heard
Defendant:
Eleanor L. Ross, Richard W. Story and William C. O'Kelly
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
HEARD v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuyler v. Story et al
as 1:2016cv04513
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Cuyler
Defendant:
Richard W. Story , Alan J. Baverman , John Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Sundy v. Friendship Pavilion Acquisition Company, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00123
Plaintiff:
Tim Sundy
Defendant:
Friendship Pavilion Acquisition Company, LLC , Arsenal Real Estate Fund II-IDF, L.P., Georgia Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
