Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Laurel Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv01557
Plaintiff:
Hero T. Smith and Tiera T. Smith
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department, Donald McGinty, Michael J. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Munoz et al
as 1:2018cv00994
Defendant:
Mark Richardson, Paola Munoz and Steven Wesley
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Andre R. Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Dr. Spraga, Dr. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Carey et al
as 1:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
James A. Wilson
Defendant:
Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Kathleen M. Jennings, Richard T. Callery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Daniello et al
as 1:2013cv00194
Defendant:
John P. Daniello, Todd E. Conner and William Richardson
Plaintiff:
David M. Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Knight v. Carmike Cinemas et al
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Corey Knight
Defendant:
Carmike Cinemas, Matthew Holman, William Anthony Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00263
Petitioner:
Deven M. Richardson
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
John E. Miller
Defendant:
Stanley Taylor, Carl Danburg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Runyon v. Biden et al
as 1:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, III, Paul Wallace, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Lou Garden Price, Sr.
Defendant:
Tom Carroll, Elizabeth Burris, D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
