Cases 1 - 10 of 85
McBride v. Enge
as 1:2024cv00379
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Warden Jamadre L. Enge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richie v. State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2022cv01757
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Alan Richie
Respondent:
State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green and Lowell Dequincy Green
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Matt Johnson, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richie v. Srubar et al
as 4:2021cv03738
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Alan Richie
Defendant:
Shannon Srubar, Captain R. Rodriguez, K. Kubenaua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richie v. Charbula et al
as 4:2021cv02304
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Alan Richie
Defendant:
Kendra Charbula, Shannon Srubar and Janet Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraze v. USA
as 4:2020cv00273
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richie Louis Krase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richie v. The State of Texas et al
as 6:2020cv00007
Respondent:
Parnell McNamara and The State of Texas
Petitioner:
Stenson Torrez Richie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richie v. Matula et al
as 1:2019cv00765
Plaintiff:
Stenson Torrez Richie
Defendant:
Officer Billy Grann, Waco Police Department and Officer Chris Matula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richie v. Matula et al
as 6:2019cv00451
Plaintiff:
Stenson Torrez Richie
Defendant:
Officer Billy Grann, Waco Police Department and Officer Chris Matula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
