Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Beckett v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Beckett v. Itex Group LLC
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Itex Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Beckett v. Warden, Byrd Unit
as 4:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Warden Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckett v. Warden, Byrd Unit
as 1:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Respondent:
Warden, Byrd Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckett v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2022cv00358
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckett v. OW Collins Sr Living - ITEX Group
as 1:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
OW Collins Sr Living - ITEX Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckett v. Port Arthur Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Port Arthur Police Department and Jefferson County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckett v. Stephens
as 1:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckett v. Stephens
as 4:2022cv01758
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckett v. Jefferson County Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wayne Beckett
Defendant:
Jefferson County Correctional Facility and Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
