Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Toki v. Rio Properties Inc
as 2:2014cv00254
Defendant:
Rio Properties Inc
Plaintiff:
Tanya Toki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension Trust v. Hamada Rio Partnership, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00990
Defendant:
Jay Hamada, Mariko Hamada, Hamada F.H., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Southern Nevada Culinary and Bartenders Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Rio Properties, Inc. v. Xtreme Merchandising, LLC
as 2:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
Rio Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Xtreme Merchandising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vaca et al v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00940
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Sproule Vaca and Raymond Vaca, Jr.
Defendant:
Harrah's Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Operating Company, Inc. and Rio Properties Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Valencia Bible v. Rio Properties, Inc.
as 08-55832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VALENCIA BIBLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
RIO PROPERTIES, INC., a Nevada corporation doing business as Rio All Suites Hotel and Casino
Rio Properties, Inc. v. May
as 2:2008cv00558
Plaintiff:
Rio Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Edward Paul May
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rio Properties, Inc. v. Clockwork Home Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rio Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Clockwork Home Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
