Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hensley et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hensley, Domenique Sedillo, Gabriel Perez and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Isaac J. Ortiz, Lawrence P. Rivas, Angelo Tinoco and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pascual v. Rivas
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marcos Pedraza Pascual
Defendant:
Sara Justice Rivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rivas v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Felciano Rivas
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rugg v. Tafoya et al
as 2:2020cv00353
Defendant:
L Rivas, Alisha Lucero Tafoya and German Franco
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Rugg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Lea County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Preston J Blake
Defendant:
Lea County Correctional Facility, Geo Group, Inc., R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Elwell et al
as 1:2017cv00333
Petitioner:
Jermaine Garcia
Respondent:
Matthew Elwell, David Rivas , Steve Afeman and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Calderon, et al. v. Lea County Correctional Facility et al.
as 1:2016cv00938
Plaintiff:
Noel Calderon, Chris Bell and Niel Garcia
Defendant:
Lea County Correctional Facility, Roswell Correctional Center, FNU Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
