Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Ebanks v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2022cv02350
Plaintiff:
Errol Ebanks
Defendant:
Gustavo Ruiz, Carlos Rivera and Stream Auto Outlet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Rivera v. Mastercard Inc.
as 7:2021cv10181
Plaintiff:
Pedro Caro Rivera
Defendant:
Mastercard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera et al v. Chadrad Motors, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Chadrad Motors, LLC, Chadi Creiha and Chadi Chreiha
Plaintiff:
Edgar Rivera and Maggie Rivera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Rivera v. Universal Motors, LLC
as 3:2020cv01685
Defendant:
Universal Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Cheila Rivera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Rivera et al v. La Rosa Del Monte Express, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv09049
Defendant:
La Rosa Del Monte Worldwide Movers, RDM Transport Group, LLC, La Rosa Del Monte Express, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Efrain Rivera and Ana M Almanzar
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701
New York Health & Racquet Club, Inc. v. Rivera et al.
as 1:2016cv07993
Plaintiff:
New York Health & Racquet Club, Inc.
Defendant:
Hector E Rivera and D4 MSP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Montero Rivera v. Ruiz, SR et al
as 1:2016cv07328
Plaintiff:
Hilda Montero Rivera
Defendant:
Hector M. Ruiz, SR. , Hector M. Ruiz, JR. , Rosa Ruiz Arroyo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacNeill et al
as 2:2014cv04728
Plaintiff:
John MacNeill and Keila Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MacNeill et al v. OptumInsight, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04730
Plaintiff:
John MacNeill and Keila Rivera
Defendant:
OptumInsight, Inc. and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MacNeill et al v. OptumInsight, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04730
Plaintiff:
John MacNeill and Keila M. Rivera
Defendant:
OptumInsight, Inc. and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
