Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rivera v. Does
as 3:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
Does
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hearron v. Irons et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Dr. Jefferson P. Maldonald, MDOC Parole Officer Barbara Clark, Lt. Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera-Jimenez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
Isaac Rivera-Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America and Rankin County, Mississippi Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bhatia v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Lal Bhatia
Defendant:
United States of America, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Davis v. Magee et al
as 2:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jawan Rivera Davis
Defendant:
Billy Magee and Forrest County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Little et al
as 3:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
O. Little, Derrick Edwards, Health Assurance Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Buscher et al
as 3:2013cv00858
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Jerry Buscher, M.T.C. Inc., O. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Buscher et al
as 4:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Jerry Buscher, M.T.C. Inc., O. Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Ovalle et al
as 4:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
F. Ovalle, F. Rice, MTC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Ball et al
as 4:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
Keith Ball, H. Hollie, F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
