Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vega Genchi v. Grand River Grain, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
Francisco Vega Genchi and Carlos Vega Genchi
Defendant:
Keith E. Hanenburg and Grand River Grain, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Champine v. Rivers et al
as 3:2018cv12922
Defendant:
Richard Rivers, Rivers Chiropractic Center, P.C. and Julia Rivers
Plaintiff:
Apryl Champine
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Acosta v. Pine River Healthcare, LLC
as 2:2017cv12321
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Pine River Healthcare, LLC
Hicks v. East River Investment Co. et al
as 2:2017cv11776
Plaintiff:
Victor Hicks
Defendant:
East River Investment Co. and Nicholas Finazzo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Whittie v. River Rouge, City of et al
as 2:2016cv10090
Plaintiff:
Dennis Whittie
Defendant:
River Rouge, City of and Deborah Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians and its Employee Welfare Plan v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2015cv13708
Plaintiff:
Little River Band of Ottawa Indians and its Employee Welfare Plan
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Lohr v. Grand River Navigation, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14353
Plaintiff:
Michael Lohr
Defendant:
Grand River Navigation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Crook v. Rabbit River Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Crook
Defendant:
Rabbit River Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. River Rouge, City of et al
as 2:2013cv12461
Plaintiff:
Michael J Wilson
Defendant:
River Rouge, City of and Jeffrey Harris
Bricklayers Pension Trust Fund - Metropolitan Area et al v. River City Contracting, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv10493
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Pension Trust Fund - Metropolitan Area , Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Retirement Savings Plan , Bricklayers Holiday Trust Fund, Metropolitan Area and others
Defendant:
River City Contracting, LLC, Randy G Martinuzzi and Willie L. Hartfield
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
