Cases 1 - 10 of 149
von der Schmidt et al v. Higgins et al
as 1:2024cv03462
Plaintiff:
Edward M. von der Schmidt and Keanna Ngo
Defendant:
Tom Higgins and Silverstein Properties doing business as River Place Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Atkins et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Atkins, Augello, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
Pinkham v. Rivers et al
as 7:2023cv10956
Plaintiff:
Candy L. Pinkham
Defendant:
Bernard Rivers, Keith Donohue, Andre Frontis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fa Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation-False Arrest
Rivers v. Ingber
as 1:2023cv08670
Plaintiff:
Darney Rivers
Defendant:
M.D. Reuben S. Ingber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Rivers v. Ingber
as 1:2023cv10006
Plaintiff:
Darney Rivers
Defendant:
M.D. Reuben S. Ingber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 mm Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Rivers v. Western Beef Retail, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv09867
Plaintiff:
Eric Rivers
Defendant:
Western Beef Retail, Inc, CACTUS HOLDINGS INC. and Peter Castellana Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
